SC clears Maliksi in P125M relocation project scandal
The Supreme Court (SC) cleared former Cavite Governor Erineo S. Maliksi from corruption charges arising from alleged anomalies in a P125-million relocation contract for informal settlers affected by the planned extension of the southern leg of the Light Rail Transit (LRT).
In a 16-page resolution dated Sept. 26 and released to media Tuesday, the SC granted the petition filed by Maliksi and private individual Cynthia S. Montesclaros and reversed the Ombudsman’s ruling against the two.
“The Ombudsman committed grave abuse of discretion in finding the existence of evident bad faith, gross inexcusable negligence and manifest partiality,” the SC said in its resolution.
The case was an offshoot of the deal in February 2008 when the Light Rail Transit Authority and the Cavite provincial government entered into a Memorandum of Agreement for the identification, acquisition and development of a relocation site for the informal settlers affected by the LRT-1 South Extension Project.
LRT obligated and released the initial amount of P500,000 to fast-track the implementation of the project.
In January 2009, Cavite entered into a deed of absolute sale with Montesclaros over 14 parcels of land in Barangay Santiago, General Trias, Cavite measuring 209,147 square meters for a total of P125.48 million.
The province, however, ended paying up additional P16 million for additional expenses.
On March 31, 2011, the Commission on Audit (COA) issued a notice of disallowance for the payments for lack of basis as the deed of
absolute sale provided that the purchase price was already net of taxes, fees, expenses, brokers’ commission, tenants’ disturbance compensation and damages.
The controversy eventually prompted the corruption complaint against Maliksi. (PNA)
Recommended on other sites
Politiko Main Latest News
North Luzon Latest News
Metro Manila Latest News
Central Luzon Latest News
Bicol Latest News
Visayas Latest News
Mindanao Latest News
The comments posted on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of POLITICS.com.ph. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.